Release date: 7 December 2011
Promoter – Financial Intermediary
Ministry of Transport of the Czech Republic;
Managing Authority of the Operational Programme of Transport in the Czech Republic
Location
Description
The project consists of the construction of an expressway between Jenišov and Kamenný Dvůr with a total length of 24.85 km. It is part of the TEN-T road between Praha and Schweinfurt (Germany).
Objectives
The project contains some 6 km of construction or rehabilitation of lower class roads to ensure an alternative connection to support this section of the R6 in case of occasional closures.
Comments
Under framework loan.
Sector(s)
Proposed EIB finance (Approximate amount)
Up to CZK 2.7 billion (EUR 108 million)
Total cost (Approximate amount)
CZK 11.5 billion (EUR 458 million)
Environmental aspects
The project falls under Annex I of the EIA Directive 85/337/EEC as amended by Directives 97/11/EC and 2003/35/EC, being subject to an assessment in accordance with Articles 5 to 10 of the EIA Directive. An EIA has already been carried out in 1997-2000 following the legislation in place at that time. The Act No. 244/1992 Coll. on the Environmental Impact Assessment applicable at that moment was managed by the Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic.
Procurement
EU procurement directives (2004/17/EC, 2004/18/EC) have been transposed into Czech legislation by the Act No. 137/2006 Coll. The contract notices for the international open tender were published in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU). The main construction contracts for the four lots were published in the OJEU under the reference numbers 2007/S169-208407 (lot 1), 2008/S210-279004 (lot 2), 2008/S233-309389 (lot 3) and 2006/S77-080624 (lot 4). The procurement process is acceptable to the Bank.
Status
Under appraisal - 7/12/2011
Disclaimer
Before financing approval by the Board of Directors, and before loan signature, projects are under appraisal and negotiation. The information and data provided on this page are therefore indicative.
They are provided for transparency purposes only and cannot be considered to represent official EIB policy (see also the Explanatory notes).