corporate_banner_en

At what stage of the EIB project cycle are complaints admissible?

Who we are
Some dates and figures
EIB impact: Boosting GDP and jobs
Chronology of the EIB
Governance and structure
Shareholders
Statutory bodies
Board of Governors
Ethics and Compliance Committee
Appointment Advisory Committee
Board of Directors
Board Committee on Staff Remuneration and Budget
Board Committee on Risk Policy
Board Committee on Equity Participation Policy
Management Committee
Audit Committee
Control and evaluation
Organisation structure
Corporate responsibility
Responsible finance
Responsible borrower
Our footprint
An employer of choice
Community engagement
Reporting on sustainability
G.R.I.
Compliance
Tax good governance
Accountability
Complaints mechanism
Cases
Admissibility
Procedure
Initial assessment
Investigation
Mediation
Consultation
Our response
Admissibility timing
Procedure summary
How to complain
FAQ
Fraud and corruption
How to report fraud or corruption
Part of the EU family
European Fund for Strategic Investments
EFSI projects
EFSI project list
What is EFSI?
How does a project get EFSI financing?
Governance
Steering Board
Investment Committee
Tackling global challenges together
Together on forced displacement and migration
Together on infrastructure
Together on climate
Partners
Civil society
Events
Consultations
Key policies and standards
Contacts
The EIB’s commitment to transparent lending
Banking community
Multilateral development banks
Universities
Jobs
Working for the EIB
Professional and managerial
Administrative and support
The GRAD programme
Secondments
Student jobs
Selection process
Current vacancies
FAQ - Jobs
Procurement
Economic research
European research hub
Our research
Surveys and data
Promoting dialogue
Assessing the macroeconomic impact of EIB activities

At what stage of the EIB project cycle are complaints admissible?

Pre-appraisal stage

Complaints are inadmissible at the pre-appraisal stage but concerns are forwarded to the relevant part of the EIB’s organisation.

Projects under appraisal

EIB-CM at this stage (i) ensures that complainants’ concerns are given due consideration and (ii) seeks to prevent future complaints in this area. This work follows one of these two procedures:

Standard procedure: If the complainants have not had the opportunity to put their case to the relevant EIB staff, the complaint is transferred to the appraisal team and closed. Complainants are informed that if at the end of the appraisal process they feel that their concerns have not been given due consideration, they may consider launching a new complaint. The EIB-CM will follow-up internally to ensure that concerns have been given due consideration. At least, the appraisal team has to contact the complainant and analyse their concerns.

Exceptional procedure: If the appraisal team refuses to engage with the complainants’ concerns or they have already been examined and dismissed, the EIB-CM may decide to perform an Initial Assessment in cooperation with the relevant EIB departments. This assessment which may include recommendations for further action is send to the Management Committee. Any subsequent EIB-CM investigative work and mediation may only take place when agreed by the Management Committee.

After financing approval

As soon as the proposal for financing is approved by the EIB’s Management Committee, the full complaint handling process may apply.

It should be noted that in many cases the project is approved with a number of conditions to be fulfilled by the borrower before the EIB will disburse the financing. In such cases, the EIB-CM will work with the relevant parts of the EIB’s organisation to ensure coordination.


 Print