Search En menu en ClientConnect
Search
Results
Top 5 search results See all results Advanced search
Top searches
Most visited pages
    Reference: 20030333
    Release date: 24 October 2003

    Promoter – Financial Intermediary

    Sunderland Housing Group
    Contact point: Andrew Taylor, FD,
    Emperor House,
    2 Emperor Way, Doxford
    International Business Park,
    Sunderland,Tyne and Wear
    SR3 3XR United Kingdom.

    Location

    Description

    Following its purchase of Sunderland City Council’s social housing stock, the Sunderland Housing Group (“SHG”) is to undertake a second phase of its planned improvement programme, as part of the city’s wider urban renewal strategy. The second phase will consist of building 3000 new houses for social rent to replace poor quality stock which is to be demolished.

    Objectives

    The objective is to extend SHG’s programme for the renewal of the urban environment in Sunderland by modernising the city’s social housing.

    Comments

    Construction/ social housing.

    Sector(s)

    Proposed EIB finance (Approximate amount)

    Up to EUR 108 million (GBP 75 million)

    Total cost (Approximate amount)

    Up to EUR 359 million (GBP 250 million)

    Environmental aspects

    The construction of new properties will lead to improvement in the efficiency of tenants’ energy usage and will significantly enhance the local urban environment. In its appraisal, EIB will review the project’s planning requirements and environmental implications.

    Procurement

    Registered Social Landlords are private entities and while SHG therefore does not fall within public sector procurement regulations, it will use open competitive tender for the majority of the works.

    Status

    Signed - 25/06/2004

    Disclaimer

    Before financing approval by the Board of Directors, and before loan signature, projects are under appraisal and negotiation. The information and data provided on this page are therefore indicative.
    They are provided for transparency purposes only and cannot be considered to represent official EIB policy (see also the Explanatory notes).

    Related tags

    United Kingdom Urban development